Written on 25 Feb 2011 by Vincent AbrycloseAuthor: Vincent AbryName: Vincent Abry Email: vincentabry@gmail.com Site:http://www.vincentabry.com/en/about About: Blogger on Technology, Social Media, Buzz Marketing, Mobile, Science, Video Games, Robots, Jobs and Money. Geek/Dad, I love to watch Future Trends.See Authors Posts (1086)
Google announced on its official blog that he has just completed a major change to its algorithm and search engine that will impact nearly 12% of queries.
The article is written by Matt Cutts and Amit Singhal and explains that it will be in production only for US site Google.com for now.
Sites that will be negatively affected:
Google has declared open war on spam sites, those with low-value add for users and content farms. Will be concerned mainly websites which take a lot of content from other sites (duplicate content) and those that are unhelpful to the user.
It remains to be seen how the engine will specifically deal with huge content farms in U.S. as Demand Media’s eHow for example, which publishes around 6,000 new articles every day.
Sites that will rank better in SERPs :
All pages of high value to the user, with rich content, analysis, studies, and especially original content (unique). These sites will be rewarded by Google with a better visibility in the SERP (search results pages), and therefore more visitors in the end.
Jason Calacanis from Mahalo.com who probably felt a wind change, said a few days ago that his company was now producing a content of excellence, high-quality value, with tens of millions dollars invested to improve each page of his encyclopedia-questions/answers website, with adding lots of videos and tutorials. An example is this page about Star Wars. Really big content (too much ?). Look and scroll with your mouse … scroll… scroll…zzzz
Matt Cutts : “SEO is NOT Spam” For Matt Cutts, Search Engine Optimization is not SPAM. Wow! That will give plenty of work for all web agencies around the world. :-)
Besides, Matt adds that SEO can make the Web smarter, cl...
A Google Quality Rater cannot affect directly an URL According to Matt Cutts, answering in a blog comment on Potpiegirl, a quality rater or even multiple quality raters who flag an URL as spam or non-relevant, cannot directly affect the rankings of t...
Google Adwords and SEO : no relation Buying AdWords will not cause algorithmic search rankings to rise. The answer is clear and it comes from Matt Cutts.
"It may seem odd for a search engine to speak about the integrity of its ...
Google’s Unnatural Link Warnings Draw Confusion from SEOs To say that Google caused panic to SEOs and webmasters recently is a bit of an understatement. A lot of panic, perhaps, is more fitting. And all for a pair of warnings that made webmasters fear an ...
Does Translated Content is considered as Duplicate Content ? As a webmaster or blogger, may be you already asked yourself this single question : if I translate my own content in another language (example: english to french translation), will this be consider...
Can I flag spammy backlinks to Google ?
Interesting video from Matt Cutts who answers the question: "Is there a process through which a site owner can flag spammy links being built to their site by a competitor ? How Google does prot...
Post Penguin SEO Checklist [infographic] Search Engine Journal just made an infographic about the ultimate Post-Penguin checklist.
If your website has been hurt since April 2012 with Google Penguin search algorithm update, you need...
Linking to bad sites : not an automatic penalty Linking to bad sites can be bad for your SEO if you link to tons of bad websites (porn, pills, casino, etc..) but if we are talking about only a few broken links, expired domains or spammy URLs, th...
Google Panda Update 3.3 + 40 changes to algorithm Google confirmed 40 changes to the search engine algorithm in February, with a Panda Update.
The 3 most important points are :
-Panda update. This launch refreshes data in the Panda syste...